Mironescu v. Costner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• specifying that “[e]ven appellees waive arguments by failing to brief them”
• noting that appellees may waive issues by not briefing them
• distinguishing St. Cyr on the grounds that there existed “a plausible reading of the statutes before the [Supreme] Court under which habeas review . . . was not barred,” whereas § 2242(d) clearly precluded “consideration of CAT and FARR Act claims on habeas review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).