James Turkson v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an Immigration Judge’s predictions of likely future mistreatment are factual findings subject to clear error review
• holding that an Immigration Judge’s predictions of likely future mistreatment are factual findings subject to clear error review
• noting that “[t]his rule stems from a sensible understanding of the roles and abilities of the two bodies”
• “[A] decision regarding a petitioner’s likely future mistreatment is a factual determination, subject to [Board] review under the clearly erroneous standard.”
• “[A] decision regarding a petitioner’s likely future mistreatment is a factual determination, subject to BIA review under the clearly erroneous standard.”
• explaining the unique position of fact-finders to weigh evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).