Khouzam v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1252(a)(4) of the REAL ID Act precluded the district court from exercising jurisdiction over the petitioner’s habeas petition
• noting that in this context the terms “deportation” and “deportable” are interchangeable with the terms “removal” and “removable”
• observing that “[a] statute is not facially unconstitutional unless ‘no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid.’”
• holding “fundamental requirement of due process” is the “opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner” and it is “predicated upon the existence of a neutral and impartial decisionmaker” (quotations omitted)
• indicating that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(2) is non- jurisdictional and therefore subject to waiver
• indicating that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(2) is non- jurisdictional and therefore subject to waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).