S.D. New York· 8/15/1989
Minpeco, S.A. v. Hunt
Citations
- 718 F. Supp. 168
- 1989 WL 83453
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relevant market for section 2 claim “consisted of [silver futures contracts] together with the supply of physical silver deliverable on those expiring contracts”
- relevant market is specified futures contracts, along with physical silver supply deliverable on them
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lasker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-09-09· cited 252×
- Indu Craft, Inc. v. Bank of BarodaSecond Circuit· 1995-02-03· cited 75×
- In Re Blech Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 1997-04-04· cited 66×
- In Re Sumitomo Copper LitigationS.D. New York· 1998-03-11· cited 56×
- Werner v. Satterlee, Stephens, Burke & BurkeS.D. New York· 1992-07-28· cited 45×
- In Re Soybean Futures LitigationN.D. Illinois· 1995-06-09· cited 35×
- In Re Pfizer Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2008-07-01· cited 30×
- Wells v. HBO & Co.N.D. Georgia· 1992-10-29· cited 20×
- In re Crude Oil Commodity Futures LitigationS.D. New York· 2012-12-21· cited 18×
- Shak v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.S.D. New York· 2016-01-12· cited 16×
- In Re Crazy Eddie Securities LitigationE.D. New York· 1992-09-04· cited 15×
- Three Crown Ltd. Partnership v. SALOMON BROS. INC.S.D. New York· 1995-10-19· cited 12×
- Thompson's Gas & Electric Service, Inc. v. BP America Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2010-02-25· cited 10×
- Kaufman v. I-Stat Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-08-10· cited 7×
- Community Publishers, Inc. v. Donrey Corp.W.D. Arkansas· 1995-03-30· cited 4×
- Transnor (Bermuda) Ltd. v. BP North America PetroleumS.D. New York· 1990-05-10· cited 3×
- Rio Grande Royalty Co. v. Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.S.D. Texas· 2009-08-07· cited 3×
- MINPECO, SA v. HuntS.D. New York· 1989-11-08· cited 2×
- Whitlock v. JacksonS.D. Indiana· 1991-01-16· cited 2×
- Oppenheimer-Palmieri Fund, L.P. v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.E.D. New York· 1992-09-04· cited 1×
Cites
64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 2,097×
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 1,450×
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 1,058×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court· 1963-12-09· cited 780×
- Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Fifth Circuit· 1987-09-11· cited 535×
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanySeventh Circuit· 1983-10-01· cited 490×
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossSecond Circuit· 1979-06-25· cited 457×
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 412×
- United States v. Anthony IndelicatoSecond Circuit· 1989-01-13· cited 364×
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidaySecond Circuit· 1971-09-01· cited 291×
- Veteto v. WardenSupreme Court· 1983-10-11· cited 230×
- CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-09-15· cited 217×
- Brandenburg v. SeidelFourth Circuit· 1988-10-11· cited 208×
- David Glen Meyers v. Contra Costa County Department of Social Services, DefendantsNinth Circuit· 1987-03-16· cited 190×
- Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauroSecond Circuit· 1987-06-17· cited 186×
- Peil v. SpeiserThird Circuit· 1986-11-28· cited 185×
- Rios v. Enterprise Ass'n Steamfitters, Local No. 638Supreme Court· 1977-02-28· cited 174×
- Spray-Rite Service Corporation, an Iowa Corporation v. Monsanto Company, a Delaware CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1982-09-08· cited 169×
- Coleman Motor Co., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors CorporationThird Circuit· 1975-11-14· cited 163×
Other cases named Minpeco, S.A. v. Hunt
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.