Skip to main content
· 7/28/1992

Werner v. Satterlee, Stephens, Burke & Burke

Citations

  • 797 F. Supp. 1196
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11127
  • 1992 WL 177385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that consolidation would not impose an undue delay even though the lawsuits at issue were at different stages
  • concluding that consolidation would not impose an undue delay even though the lawsuits at issue were at different stages
  • finding that consolidation was appropriate even though not all facts in original case applied to the defendants in second case
  • consolidating 10b-5 claims that posed numerous common questions of law and fact, despite variations in the identity of the parties and in some of the allegations
  • consolidation of class actions appropriate even where cases lacked identity of parties
  • consolidating cases after deciding pending motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haight

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.