Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “what behavior constitutes a horizontal group boycott deserving of per se condemnation under the Sherman Act has been the source of considerable confusion in recent years” (citations omitted)
• finding that the New York Mercantile Exchange could not fasten liability on Apex for the acts of the St. Louis Commodities Corporation, Apex’s wholly owned subsidiary
• requiring dominance in both the cash and futures markets in an alleged squeeze of the futures market
• specific intent for section 2 conspiracy claim was lacking where defendants sought only to put plaintiff “in a delivery bind for no more than a few business days”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).