N.D. Georgia· 10/29/1992
Wells v. HBO & Co.
Citations
- 813 F. Supp. 1561
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20622
- 1992 WL 442341
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that a plaintiff may make “a deliberate decision not to sue a party”
- amended complaint relates back when based on the same misleading filings and statements as the original complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Camp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1994-08-12· cited 128×
- Lacedra v. Donald W. Wyatt Detention FacilityD. Rhode Island· 2004-09-13· cited 97×
- Leonard v. ParryFirst Circuit· 2000-07-17· cited 72×
- In re Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Paint LitigationE.D. Louisiana· 1998-08-25· cited 42×
- Brink v. First Credit ResourcesD. Arizona· 1999-07-12· cited 38×
- In Re Newbridge Networks Securities LitigationDistrict of Columbia· 1996-06-03· cited 20×
- In Re Bausch & Lomb, Inc. Securities LitigationW.D. New York· 1996-10-24· cited 13×
- Quaak v. Dexia, S.A.D. Massachusetts· 2006-08-08· cited 12×
- In Re Cascade International Securities LitigationS.D. Florida· 1993-12-16· cited 10×
- Tyman v. Hintz Concrete, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-12-15· cited 7×
- Figueroa v. J.C. Penney Puerto Rico, Inc.D. Puerto Rico· 2007-11-05· cited 5×
- Bond Opportunity Fund II, LLC v. HeffernanD. Rhode Island· 2004-10-22· cited 3×
- Powers v. Stuart-James Co.Eleventh Circuit· 1998-08-03· cited 1×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 1,661×
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,199×
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 775×
- Bank v. PittEleventh Circuit· 1991-04-18· cited 285×
- Pan-Islamic Trade Corporation v. Exxon CorporationFifth Circuit· 1980-12-10· cited 274×
- Herman Friedlander, Etc., Cross-Appellees v. Jerry C. Nims, Timex Corporation, Cross-AppellantEleventh Circuit· 1985-03-19· cited 136×
- Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty PartnershipSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-03-09· cited 133×
- Itel Capital Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Cups Coal Company, Incorporated, a Corporation and Herman Mulvehill, Cross-AppelleesEleventh Circuit· 1983-06-23· cited 104×
- Richard Rylewicz, Thomas Cummings and Barbara Cummings v. Beaton Services, Ltd.Seventh Circuit· 1989-11-01· cited 92×
- Kilkenny v. Arco Marine Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1986-09-19· cited 75×
- In Re Bank of Boston Corp. Securities LitigationD. Massachusetts· 1991-05-01· cited 64×
- Russell Henderson, Mildred E. Chambers and Charles E. Moore, Individually and as Class Representatives v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1992-09-11· cited 50×
- Friedlander v. TroutmanEleventh Circuit· 1986-05-09· cited 46×
- Hurley v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.D. Massachusetts· 1989-08-08· cited 46×
- Deutschman v. Beneficial Corp.D. Delaware· 1990-09-21· cited 40×
- Taliferro v. CostelloE.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-02-15· cited 39×
- Vera Smith, as of the Estate of Robert J. Smith, Deceased v. Duff and Phelps, Inc., a Corporation, and Claire v. HansenEleventh Circuit· 1990-01-16· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.