Veteto v. Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding AT & T violated section 2 of Sherman Act by refusing to connect MCI to its network, an essential facility
• rejecting defendants’ suggestion that a 26-day time limit in an antitrust case was too short and that the limit should have been computed in months, not days
• deliberately bringing administrative actions with the knowledge that the agencies involved lacked the authority to take the desired action constitutes sham activity
• plaintiff must show control of the essential facility by a monopolist
• plaintiff must show control of the essential facility by a monopolist
• judgment was remanded for a new trial and damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

195 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Ilario M.A. Zannino
  First Circuit· 1990-01-10· cited 2,914×
• Valley Liquors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.
  Seventh Circuit· 1987-07-13· cited 187×
• Marvin L. Fishman and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz, and Illinois Basketball, Inc. v. Estate of Arthur M. Wirtz
  Seventh Circuit· 1987-03-03· cited 186×
• General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-09-26· cited 169×
• Amerinet, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.
  Eighth Circuit· 1992-08-26· cited 157×
• Steve L. McKenzie D.O. v. Mercy Hospital of Independence, Kansas
  Tenth Circuit· 1988-08-10· cited 155×
• Natural Design, Inc. v. Rouse Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-12-28· cited 155×
• In Re Warner Communications Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 1985-08-20· cited 143×
• Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 1984-07-13· cited 141×
• Cianci v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1985-12-31· cited 135×
• Beatrice D. Saxion v. Titan-C-Manufacturing, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1996-06-07· cited 134×
• Barry Wright Corporation v. Itt Grinnell Corporation
  First Circuit· 1983-12-29· cited 121×
• Marshall Stewart, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Rca Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-05-12· cited 119×
• M.T. Bonk Company and Mark T. Bonk v. Milton Bradley Company and Hasbro, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-10-16· cited 118×
• Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-06-26· cited 115×
• United States v. Harry P. Casoni, A/K/A Pete Casoni
  Third Circuit· 1992-01-09· cited 111×
• United States v. Syufy Enterprises Raymond J. Syufy
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-05-09· cited 106×
• Jack Faucett Associates, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-09-11· cited 105×
• Oahu Gas Service, Inc. v. Pacific Resources Inc., Gasco, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-02-01· cited 105×
• Caller-Times Publishing Co. v. Triad Communications, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1992-02-26· cited 102×

Other cases named Veteto v. Warden

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Veteto v. Warden
  Sixth Circuit· 1983-03-25