Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “setting a high price may be a use of monopoly power, but it is not in itself anticompetitive”
• “setting a high price may be a use of monopoly power, but it is not in itself anticompetitive”
• improper, absent justification, for firm with monopoly power in one market to gain a competitive advantage in a second market by refusing to deal
• “The taint of an impure origin does not dissipate after four years if a monopolist continues to extract excessive prices because of it.”
• evidence of anticompetitive actions before the statute of limitations period was relevant even though case depended on proof of overcharge during the limitations period
• “[E]ach time a plaintiff is injured by an act of the defendants a cause of action accrues to him to recover the damages caused by that act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).