Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]n rulings on the admissibility of expert opinion evidence[,] the trial court has broad discretion….”
• stating that appropriateness of summary judgment depends solely upon whether the district court erred in excluding causation testimony of plaintiff's expert
• stating that appropriateness of summary judgment depends solely upon whether the district court erred in excluding causation testimony of plaintiff’s expert
• explaining that an expert’s “failure to take into account” key facts in forming a conclusion weakened the reliability of the opinion
• explaining that “questions relating to the bases and sources of an expert’s opinion affect the weight to be assigned that opinion rather than its admissibility and should be left for the jury’s consideration”
• discussing “proper deference to the jury’s role as the arbiter of disputes between conflicting opinions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).