Skip to main content

McHenry v. State

Citations

  • 820 N.E.2d 124
  • 2005 Ind. LEXIS 4
  • 2005 WL 22906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is the jury’s “exclusive province” to weigh evidence
  • stating that videotapes may be admitted as substantive evidence
  • setting forth standard of review for claims of sufficiency of the evidence
  • “We have often emphasized that appellate courts must consider only the probative evidence and reasonable inferences supporting the verdict.”
  • appellate court does not reweigh evidence or judge the credibility of witnesses
  • appellate court does not reweigh evidence or judge the credibility of witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

326 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named McHenry v. State

25 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.