Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 902 N.E.2d 280
  • 2009 WL 588162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant who fails to object to allegedly improper comments of a prosecutor fails to preserve any claim of prosecutorial misconduct for appellate review
  • holding that in waiting until the morning of trial to request a continuance for the purpose of hiring private counsel, defendant failed to exercise his right to hire counsel of his choice at an appropriate stage
  • observing that if an admonishment is insufficient to cure the error, the defendant must request a mistrial
  • observing that if an admonishment is insufficient to cure the error, the defendant must request a mistrial
  • holding trial court did not err by considering as an aggravator defendant’s uncharged dealing activity in defendant’s sentence for dealing in cocaine
  • defendant was found to constructively possess marijuana when, during questioning, defendant appeared Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A-CR-1261 | December 21, 2020 Page 6 of 7 nervous, refused to make eye contact, and attempted to blame his nephew

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bradford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.