Filice v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction for criminal deviate conduct as a Class B felony
• rejecting defendant’s argument that victim was aware and able to consent at time of sexual encounter as a request to reweigh the evidence
• affirming the admission of evidence where Filice’s argument raised only the possibility of tampering
• victim needed to be “unaware,” not “unconscious,” such that jury could find woman impaired by Rohypnol had been unaware that intercourse was occurring
• “[T]he nature and circumstances of a crime can be a valid aggravating factor.”
• “[w]hile there is no evidence in the record regarding specific details of the sample’s custody at Mid-America, Dr. Evans testified that AIT received the sealed sample with a ‘Bill of Lading that identifies each specimen’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).