Indiana Court of Appeals· 7/13/2007

Mendoza v. State

Citations

869 N.E.2d 546
2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 1498
2007 WL 2012723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, even if the trial court abuses its discretion in sentencing, we will not remand for resentencing if the sentence imposed is not inappropriate
noting that even if trial court abuses its discretion in sentencing, we will not remand for resentencing if the sentence imposed is not inappropriate
noting that, even if the trial court is found to have abused its discretion in sentencing, the error is harmless if the sentence imposed is not inappropriate
noting that, even if the trial court is found to have abused its discretion in sentencing, the error is harmless if the sentence imposed is not inappropriate
noting that, “even if the trial court is found to have abused its discretion in the process it used to sentence the defendant, the error is harmless if the sentence imposed was not inappropriate”
noting that, “even if the trial court is found to have abused its discretion in the process it used to sentence the defendant, the error is harmless if the sentence imposed was not inappropriate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Friedlander, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.