Bald v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant's convie-tions for three felony murders and one count of arson did not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy
• concluding “each conviction [Class A felony arson and three felony murders] required proof of at least one unique evidentiary fact”
• affirming arson and felony murder convictions based on one fire but involving multiple victims
• affirming arson and felony-murder convictions based on one fire but involving multiple victims
• double jeopardy is not violated where convictions arise from situation where separate victims are involved
• defendant waived claim of prosecutorial misconduct by failing to make prompt objections at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).