Brian L. Harrison v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing prosecutor to read from caselaw during closing argument
• affirming the trial court’s use of a jury instruction based on an Indiana pattern jury instruction utilizing the term “defendant”
• if erroneously admitted evidence was cumulative of other evidence, admission was harmless, not reversible, error
• admission of recording of jail phone call to which Harrison was a party was not erroneous; Harrison’s own statements were not hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).