Supreme Court of Iowa· 12/19/2001

McElroy v. State

Citations

637 N.W.2d 488
2001 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 229
2001 WL 1627630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \internal documents relied upon by an employer in making employment decisions in a discrimination case are generally not hearsay because they can be relevant to explain the employer's conduct\
holding that “internal documents relied upon by an employer in making employment decisions in a discrimination case are generally not hearsay because they can be relevant to explain the employer’s conduct”
concluding that a more specific rule of civil procedure controls over a more general one without a cross-reference between the two
using federal case law to flesh out the distinction between quid pro quo harassment and sexually hostile work environment claims under the ICRA
noting the instruction could have reasonably been misinterpreted by the jury without discussing how the jury would have decided with a 36 correct instruction
noting the instruction could have reasonably been misinterpreted by the jury without discussing how the jury would have decided with a correct instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady, Lavorato

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.