Clinton Physical Therapy Services, P.C. v. John Deere Health Care, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, once the jury is discharged, inconsistent verdicts in a civil case lead to reversal of judgment and remand for a new trial
• recognizing the rules governing internally inconsistent special interrogatory answers apply equally to internally inconsistent answers in a special verdict
• defining a general verdict as “a verdict in which the jury only makes a finding in favor of one party over the other party”
• finding consent to a sealed verdict did not foreclose ability to request a new trial alleging an inconsistent verdict
• comparing general verdicts, “in which the jury only makes a finding in favor of one party over the other party, “with special verdicts and general verdicts supplemented with written interrogatories
• describing Restatement (Second) of Contracts section 350 as the basis for a failure-to-mitigate argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).