Lustgraaf v. Behrens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that complaints adequately alleged misleading statements because they alleged defendant’s false statements and facts supporting an inference that those statements were false when made
• noting that the doctrine precludes a plaintiff from recovery where they “participated in the alleged wrongdoing”
• noting that whether control person liability requires culpable participation has created a circuit split and collecting cases
• noting that courts “grant all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party” for purposes of a motion to dismiss
• detailing standard under motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
• explaining standard of review on motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).