Indiana Supreme Court· 2/26/2004
McCormick v. State
Citations
- 803 N.E.2d 1108
- 15 A.L.R. 6th 835
- 2004 Ind. LEXIS 163
- 2004 WL 350987
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressly rejecting the “dual motivation analysis in the Batson context” and holding that a strike is “tainted” if one of multiple reasons for the strike is impermissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2018-05-31· cited 249×
- State v. SaintcalleWashington Supreme Court· 2013-08-01· cited 96×
- Hardister v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-06-28· cited 93×
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-05-16· cited 50×
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-11-09· cited 46×
- Addison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-02-22· cited 37×
- Akins v. EasterlingSixth Circuit· 2011-08-05· cited 36×
- Highler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-10-04· cited 34×
- Cartwright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-02-22· cited 26×
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-01-19· cited 22×
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-07-21· cited 22×
- Gray v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-08-10· cited 21×
- Richard Craig Kesser v. Steven J. Cambra, Jr., WardenNinth Circuit· 2004-12-16· cited 20×
- State v. Rey Alfredo OrnelasIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-07-24· cited 7×
- Dye v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-11-10· cited 6×
- Eugene Roach v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-06-20· cited 5×
- People v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-05-03· cited 5×
- Highler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-12-01· cited 4×
- Billy Deon Blackmon v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-15· cited 3×
- Antonio R. Whitfield v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2019-06-26· cited 3×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 7,445×
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,420×
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,335×
- Hunter v. UnderwoodSupreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 419×
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-29· cited 139×
- William Weaver,petitioner-Appellee v. Michael Bowersox,respondent-AppellantEighth Circuit· 2001-02-23· cited 133×
- Danny Jones v. Harold Plaster, Sheriff, in His Individual and Official CapacitiesFourth Circuit· 1995-06-22· cited 125×
- Clifford Howard v. Daniel A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1993-02-17· cited 121×
- Robert Allen Gattis v. Robert Snyder, Warden, Delaware Correctional CenterThird Circuit· 2002-01-24· cited 117×
- State v. ShulerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 104×
- Bormann v. AT&T Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-10-16· cited 99×
- Bradley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 84×
- Payton v. KearseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-12· cited 81×
- Kent v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 62×
- Wallace v. MorrisonEleventh Circuit· 1996-07-17· cited 47×
- State v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-02-13· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.