Danny Jones v. Harold Plaster, Sheriff, in His Individual and Official Capacities

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “when the district court fails to articulate its findings, remand for further proceedings may be necessary”
• explaining that finding by the district court that strikes were made discriminatorily is reviewed for clear error
• noting that defer- ence to the trial court can be appropriate when \it has observed with its own eyes the very act in dispute\
• applying dual motivation but remanding to district court for clarification of findings regarding whether the strike was exercised for a discriminatory purpose and whether it would have been exercised in the absence of the discriminatory purpose
• remanding a Batson challenge because we could not discern \whether the district court applied the proper legal analysis in reaching its decision to overrule [the moving party's] objection.\
• remanding for correct appli- cation of mixed-motive analysis on direct review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).