People v. Douglas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the dual-motivation approach and holding that jury selection “should be free of any bias”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Silas
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-09-17
• Hart v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-02-28
• People v. Arias
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-05-10

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 7,445×
• Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
• Hernandez v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
• Reynolds v. Sims
  Supreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
• Miller-El v. Dretke
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,931×
• People v. Doolin
  California Supreme Court· 2009-01-05· cited 1,701×
• People v. Wheeler
  California Supreme Court· 1978-09-25· cited 1,612×
• J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,420×
• JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB
  Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,335×
• Snyder v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 2008-03-19· cited 1,296×
• Rice v. Collins
  Supreme Court· 2006-01-18· cited 1,140×
• Johnson v. California
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,022×
• People v. Cunningham
  California Supreme Court· 2001-08-15· cited 1,013×
• Obergefell v. Hodges
  Supreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 955×
• United States v. Windsor
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-26· cited 647×
• People v. Centeno
  California Supreme Court· 2014-12-04· cited 579×
• People v. McKinnon
  California Supreme Court· 2011-08-22· cited 543×
• Hunter v. Underwood
  Supreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 419×
• People v. Zambrano
  California Supreme Court· 2007-07-30· cited 311×