Supreme Court· 10/16/1989
Bormann v. AT&T Communications, Inc.
Citations
- 493 U.S. 924
- 110 S. Ct. 292
- 107 L. Ed. 2d 272
- 58 U.S.L.W. 3258
- 1989 U.S. LEXIS 4912
- 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,438
- 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1728
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment”
- holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment”
- holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment”
- holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, \counsel's failure to call witnesses is of no moment\
- holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment”
- holding unsupervised release of ADEA rights permissible if knowing and voluntary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Consideration, Took
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Coleman Vital v. Interfaith Medical Center and Local 1199Second Circuit· 1999-02-19· cited 315×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-22· cited 169×
- Richard Craig Kesser v. Steven J. Cambra, Jr., WardenNinth Circuit· 2006-09-11· cited 159×
- Richard James Wilkerson v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionFifth Circuit· 1992-01-06· cited 148×
- Eugene Pierce v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., D/B/A Santa Fe Railroad Co., Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1995-08-30· cited 118×
- John O. ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1996-01-12· cited 105×
- Cook v. LaMarqueNinth Circuit· 2010-01-07· cited 87×
- People v. HopeIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-05-30· cited 84×
- Payton v. KearseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-12· cited 81×
- Albert J. Taggi & Ann D. Taggi v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1994-09-12· cited 77×
- People v. HudsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-03-02· cited 77×
- Berneda R. O'Shea v. Commercial Credit CorporationFourth Circuit· 1991-04-11· cited 61×
- Peter J. Laniok v. Advisory Committee of the Brainerd Manufacturing Company Pension PlanSecond Circuit· 1991-06-18· cited 60×
- Western PCS II Corp. v. Extraterritorial Zoning Authority of Santa FeD. New Mexico· 1997-02-27· cited 56×
- Beadle v. City of TampaEleventh Circuit· 1995-01-18· cited 56×
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Cardoza-RodriguezFirst Circuit· 1998-01-08· cited 47×
- People v. BeauvaisSupreme Court of Colorado· 2017-04-24· cited 45×
- David TORREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO, INC., Defendant-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1990-07-20· cited 44×
- McCormick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-02-26· cited 44×
- Keelan v. Bell CommunicationsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-04-11· cited 39×
Other cases named Bormann v. AT&T Communications, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.