Skip to main content

Cartwright v. State

Citations

  • 962 N.E.2d 1217
  • 2012 Ind. LEXIS 19
  • 2012 WL 560086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that removal of the only African- American juror that could have served on the jury is sufficient to establish a prima facie case under Batson
  • providing that neither state nor federal law require a trial court to make explicit findings when deciding whether the State offered a race-neutral reason for striking a potential juror
  • providing that neither state nor federal law require a trial court to make explicit findings when deciding whether the State offered a race-neutral reason for striking a potential juror
  • finding that need to urinate frequently was race-neutral reason for strike
  • rejecting defendant's contention that trial court must explicitly state reasons for deciding a Batson challenge and noting that at least one federal circuit court has declared that federal law has never required explicit fact-findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, David

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.