Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/3/1982

Anderson v. State

Citations

633 S.W.2d 851
1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court’s denial of a challenge to the juror’s qualifications for cause was not reversible error
holding that the trial court’s denial of a challenge to the juror’s qualifications for cause was not reversible error
holding that the trial court = s denial of a challenge to the juror = s qualifications for cause was not reversible error
holding trial court lacks discretion to refuse challenges to prospective jurors who are biased as a matter of law
stating that the trial court has discretion to determine whether bias exists and when a trial court overrules a challenge for cause, the decision will be reviewed in light of all of the answers the prospective juror gave
stating that A [i]f defendant = s objection to prosecutor = s final argument on ground that argument invited jury to speculate that there was other evidence detrimental to defendant which jury had not heard had been overruled, a reversal would be required @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Odom, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

193 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.