Mayle v. Felix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim that challenges a pretrial 3 event and a claim that challenges a trial event do not arise from a common core of operative 4 facts
• rejecting 25 “assumption that claim preclusion operates in habeas cases largely as it does in mine-run civil 26 cases”
• “If claims asserted after the one-year period could be revived simply because they relate to the same trial, conviction, or sentence as a timely filed claim, AEDPA’s limitation period would have slim significance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).