Jimenez v. Quarterman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state convictions are final under § 2244(d)(1)(A) when Supreme Court certiorari is exhausted or when the time for filing a certiorari petition expires
• holding that direct review ends when a petitioner’s time to appeal to the United States Supreme Court expires
• holding that a conviction becomes final when “the time for filing a certiorari petition expires”
• holding that a conviction is not “final” until resolution of an out-of-time direct appeal
• holding that a state habeas order granting an out of time appeal can “reset AEDPA’s 1-year limitations period,” since it effectively “restore[s] the pendency of the direct appeal”
• holding that a judgment ceased to be “final” for purposes of federal postconviction proceedings after a state court “restore[d] the pendency of the direct appeal” (alteration in original and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).