Ninth Circuit· 12/26/2007
Smith v. Baldwin
Citations
- 510 F.3d 1127
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29743
- 2007 WL 4485872
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a prisoner must first exhaust available remedies before a federal court may consider the merits of a habeas petition
- noting that a prisoner must first exhaust available remedies before a federal court may consider the merits of a habeas petition
- noting that a prisoner must first exhaust available remedies before a federal court may consider the merits of a habeas petition
- noting that a prisoner must first exhaust available remedies before a federal court may consider the merits of a habeas petition
- noting that a prisoner must first exhaust available remedies before a federal court may consider the merits of a habeas petition
- noting that a prisoner must first exhaust available remedies before a federal court may consider the merits of a habeas petition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kozinski, Schroeder, Reinhardt, Kleinfeld, Thomas, McKeown, Wardlaw, Fletcher, Fisher, Paez, Tallman, Clifton, Bybee, Smith, Ikuta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kelly Park v. Karen ThompsonNinth Circuit· 2017-03-14· cited 306×
- George Alvarez v. City of BrownsvilleFifth Circuit· 2018-09-18· cited 115×
- Dearcey Stewart v. Matthew CateNinth Circuit· 2014-05-01· cited 78×
- Hamilton v. AyersNinth Circuit· 2009-09-18· cited 64×
- Felix Rocha v. Rick Thaler, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2010-11-17· cited 53×
- Stokley v. RyanNinth Circuit· 2011-09-26· cited 48×
- United States v. Joshua LucasNinth Circuit· 2016-11-08· cited 21×
- Roberts v. HowtonD. Oregon· 2014-04-09· cited 12×
- Gregory Dickens v. Charles L. RyanNinth Circuit· 2012-08-03· cited 7×
- Ransom v. AdamsNinth Circuit· 2009-02-26· cited 7×
- Dearcey Stewart v. Matthew CateNinth Circuit· 2013-11-01· cited 5×
- Adams v. HarrisonNinth Circuit· 2008-02-01· cited 4×
- Mansfield v. Williamson CtyFifth Circuit· 2022-03-31· cited 3×
- Coleman v. AllisonC.D. California· 2015-05-28· cited 3×
- Dickey v. DavisE.D. California· 2017-01-13· cited 3×
- Hartawan v. GordonNinth Circuit· 2008-01-31· cited 3×
- Hageman v. HillNinth Circuit· 2009-03-02· cited 2×
- Pinnell v. BellequeD. Oregon· 2009-06-26· cited 1×
- Shah v. Department of JusticeD. Nevada· 2015-02-02· cited 1×
- Moody v. DexterC.D. California· 2009-10-28
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 7,671×
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court· 1982-03-08· cited 5,808×
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-05-18· cited 5,336×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court· 1991-04-16· cited 3,331×
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,060×
- House v. BellSupreme Court· 2006-06-12· cited 2,367×
- Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 1,942×
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
- Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 1,098×
- Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court· 2003-03-25· cited 823×
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court· 1972-12-04· cited 788×
- Larry David Davis v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinNinth Circuit· 2004-09-21· cited 424×
- Wood v. BartholomewSupreme Court· 1995-10-10· cited 330×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.