Teti v. Bender

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a discovery request because the petitioner “did not comply with 14 the specific requirements of Rule (6)(b); his request for discovery is generalized and does 15 not indicate exactly what information he seeks to obtain”
• denying a discovery request 5 because the petitioner “did not comply with the specific requirements of Rule (6)(b); his 6 request for discovery is generalized and does not indicate exactly what information he 7 seeks to obtain”
• “A decision can still be reasonable even if the reviewing court thinks it is wrong . . . .”
• “A decision can still be reasonable even if the reviewing court thinks it is wrong; ‘unreasonable’ here means something more than incorrect or erroneous.”
• “A decision can still be reasonable even if the reviewing court thinks it is wrong; ‘unreasonable’ here means something more than incorrect or erroneous.”
• “A decision can still be reasonable even if the reviewing court thinks it is wrong; ‘unreasonable’ here means something more than incorrect or erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).