Skip to main content

Love v. State

Citations

  • 199 S.W.3d 447
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 5179
  • 2006 WL 1669015

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence showed appellant knew gun was brought when co-conspirator removed something wrapped in white towel from truck during criminal transaction
  • stating that we review trial court’s decision not to submit defensive jury instruction for abuse of discretion
  • holding evidence was sufficient to show murder was committed in attempt to carry out robbery and should have been anticipated by appellant when appellant helped plan robbery and knew that firearms would be used
  • stating that victim- impact evidence concerns effect victim’s death had on others
  • “Texas law requires a party to continue to object each time inadmissible evidence is offered, except when defense counsel 37 requests a running objection or objects out of the presence of the jury to all testimony he deems objectionable on a given subject.”
  • per curiam op. on reh’g

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jane Bland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.