Skip to main content

Hartman v. State

Citations

  • 198 S.W.3d 829
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6869
  • 2006 WL 2167992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that a jury may consider a defendant’s refusal to submit to a breath test as evidence of driving while intoxicated
  • reasoning that a jury may consider a defendant = s refusal to submit to a breath test as evidence of driving while intoxicated
  • reasoning that a jury may consider a defendant’s refusal to submit to a breath test as evidence of driving while intoxicated
  • “Importantly, Hartman does not address the evidence of the strong odor of alcohol . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yaã‘ez and Castillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.