Supreme Court of Florida· 9/20/2012

Martin v. State

Citations

107 So. 3d 281
37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 563
2012 Fla. LEXIS 1815
2012 WL 4125813

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a confession was admissible as “[t]here was no express or implied promise of leniency made to [the defendant] in return for his statements”
deciding whether officers’ interrogation tactics “overbore [the suspect’s] free will such that he was unable to make a rationale choice with regard to confessing”
noting that the interview “did not occur in an unduly oppressive ehvironment”
repeating that the Davis rationale equally applies to the right to remain silent
“[A]n invocation of one’s right to remain silent must be made in clear and unequivocal terms if it follows a previous, knowing and voluntary waiver of one’s Miranda rights.” (citations omitted)
discussing comments that have been held to be equivocal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

89 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.