Joseph Edward Jordan v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was no fundamental error because, in part, the victim’s aunt “did not opine about . . . the appropriate sentence”
• “[The prosecutor] explained to the jury how the law was applicable to the evidence presented at trial . . . . Such an explanation is a permissible argument.”
• “Although Jordan does not raise the issue of sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, we nevertheless must independently review ‘the evidence to determine whether [it supports the] murder conviction.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).