Skip to main content

Banks v. State

Citations

  • 732 So. 2d 1065
  • 1999 WL 215372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that before trial court can impose downward departure, there must be a \valid legal ground and adequate factual support for that ground....\
  • holding that whether a trial court should impose a departure sentence “is a judgment call within the sound discretion of the court and will be sustained on review absent an abuse of discretion”
  • explaining that sentencing discretion is only abused when “no reasonable person would agree with the trial court's decision”
  • holding that a victim’s out-of-court identification was sufficient to support adjudication
  • explaining that when a trial court determines whether it should depart from the sentencing guidelines, it must weigh the totality of the circumstances, including aggravating factors
  • holding that the aspect of a trial court's decision as to whether it should impose a downward departure sentence \is a judgment call within the sound discretion of the court and will be sustained on review absent an abuse of discretion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

229 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Banks v. State

368 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.