Skip to main content
· 3/25/1999

Martin v. Beverage Capital Corp.

Citations

  • 726 A.2d 728
  • 353 Md. 388
  • 1999 Md. LEXIS 116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “in interpreting and determining legislative intent, we must look to the plain language of the enactment, while keeping in mind its overall purpose and aim.”
  • “[The] statute should be liberally construed so that any ambiguity, uncertainty or conflict is resolved in favor of the claimant, in order to effect the statute’s benevolent purposes.” (quoting Linder Crane Serv. Co. v. Hogan, 86 Md. App. 438, 443 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Raker, Wilner, Murphy, Thieme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.