Frank v. Baltimore County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Mr. Frank’s argument because adopting the argument would “frustrate the legislature’s intention to minimize the burden on the public treasury that would result from providing duplicate benefits to public employees[]”
• rejecting Mr. Frank’s argument because adopting the argument would “frustrate the legislature’s intention to minimize the burden on the public treasury that would result from providing duplicate benefits to public employees[]”
• cit- ing Maryland Bureau of Mines v. Powers, 258 Md. 879, 382, 265 A.2d 860 (1970)
• set off appropriate where Baltimore County policeman had made contribution to disability pension received by County
• “[T]he General Assembly wished to provide only a single recovery for a single injury for government employees covered by both a pension plan and workmen’s compensation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).