Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/9/2003
Livering v. Richardson's Restaurant
Citations
- 823 A.2d 687
- 374 Md. 566
- 2003 Md. LEXIS 250
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Act essentially is remedial, social legislation designed to protect workers and their families from various hardships that result from employment-related injuries.”
- “Because many of the facts relevant to analyzing ‘arising out of’ and ‘in the course of’ overlap in this particular case, we shall consider the two tests together.”
- “The positional-risk test is essentially a ‘but for’ test”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-06· cited 47×
- Pak v. HoangCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-18· cited 46×
- Benway v. Maryland Port AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-01· cited 13×
- Roberts v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-01-28· cited 12×
- Chaney Enterprises Ltd. Partnership v. WindsorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-16· cited 10×
- Del Marr v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-05· cited 10×
- Mayor of Baltimore City v. JohnsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-23· cited 9×
- Keystone Masonry Corp. v. HernandezCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-19· cited 9×
- Doe v. Buccini Pollin Group, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-03· cited 5×
- State v. OkaforCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-10-02· cited 4×
- Prince George's County v. ProctorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-26· cited 4×
- Schwan Food Co. v. FrederickCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-06-27· cited 3×
- Hubbel v. Board of Trustees of the Fire & Police Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-27· cited 2×
- Jennifer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-26· cited 2×
- Montgomery Cnty. v. MaloneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-04-07· cited 1×
- (2003)Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2003-08-29
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-06-28
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mayor of Baltimore v. CassidyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-04-10· cited 73×
- Holman v. Kelly Catering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-04-15· cited 44×
- Pariser Bakery & State Accident Fund v. KoontzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-07-30· cited 43×
- Knoche v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-04-25· cited 39×
- Martin v. Beverage Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-03-25· cited 29×
- Hoffman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-12-23· cited 23×
- Montgomery County v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-03-14· cited 22×
- Mulready v. University Research Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-26· cited 19×
- Bethlehem-Sparrows Point Shipyard, Inc. v. HempfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1955-03-25· cited 19×
- Crane Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court· 1922-12-19· cited 16×
- Texas General Indemnity Company v. LuceCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1973-03-01· cited 13×
- Board of County Commissioners v. VacheCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-14· cited 13×
- St. Anthony Hospital v. JamesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-12-20· cited 9×
- Montgomery County v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-06-03· cited 9×
- Dunlap v. Clinton Valley CenterMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-06-08· cited 8×
- Martinez v. StollerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-08-13· cited 6×
- Elmer E. Stockman Jr., Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals· 1971-02-01· cited 6×
- Nails v. Market Tire Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-12-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.