Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/26/1995
Oaks v. Connors
Citations
- 339 Md. 24
- 660 A.2d 423
- 1995 Md. LEXIS 86
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the fact that employee used his car at work for the employer’s benefit did not render the drive to work “special circumstances” warranting respondeat superior liability
- “Driving to and from work is generally not considered to be within the scope of a servant’s employment.... ” (emphasis added)
- “The cardinal rule of statutory interpretation is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.”
- “The ‘right to control’ concept is key to a respondeat superior analysis in the motor vehicle context.”
- “[A] loss of consortium claim is derivative of the injured spouse’s claim for personal injury[.]”
- “[A] consortium claim must be filed jointly by a couple and tried concurrently with the claim of the physically injured spouse in order to avoid duplication of awards.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
178 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kerns v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 2009-10-29· cited 1,050×
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-05-16· cited 212×
- Casey v. Geek Squad® Subsidiary Best Buy Stores, L.P.D. Maryland· 2011-11-10· cited 206×
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-14· cited 158×
- Coburn v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-04-17· cited 149×
- Mayor of Baltimore v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-27· cited 142×
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-08· cited 120×
- Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-31· cited 111×
- Carter v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-02-19· cited 106×
- Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-28· cited 98×
- In Re Mark M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-05· cited 96×
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-07· cited 94×
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-17· cited 93×
- O'CONNOR v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-26· cited 93×
- Catonsville Nursing Home, Inc. v. LovemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-15· cited 91×
- D'AOUST v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-01-31· cited 86×
- Marzullo v. KahlCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-12· cited 85×
- Beyer v. Morgan State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-06-10· cited 84×
- Proctor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-03-12· cited 84×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-08-10· cited 82×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-09-29· cited 219×
- Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-07· cited 192×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-09-26· cited 133×
- Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-05· cited 101×
- Embrey v. HollyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-03-23· cited 96×
- Franklin v. Mazda Motor Corp.D. Maryland· 1989-02-02· cited 62×
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Victill Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-10-01· cited 54×
- Outmezguine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-03· cited 49×
- Fish Market Nominee Corp. v. G.A.A. Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-12-16· cited 36×
- Klein v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-07· cited 32×
- Dhanraj v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-27· cited 31×
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CornelsenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-06-21· cited 29×
- Parrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-19· cited 24×
- L.M.T. Steel Products, Inc. v. PeirsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-06· cited 22×
- Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane v. TornilloCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-11· cited 22×
- Connors v. OaksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-06· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.