Skip to main content
· 8/28/2002

Ditto v. Stoneberger

Citations

  • 805 A.2d 1148
  • 145 Md. App. 469
  • 2002 Md. App. LEXIS 132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing “substantial” in CJ § 3-904(b) to mean contributions by the decedent of “real worth and considerable value”
  • “A denial of a motion in limine to exclude evidence ... does not preserve an evidentiary issue for appeal. Rather, the party who made the motion to exclude evidence must make a contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is introduced at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salmon, Sonner, Moylan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.