Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/13/2001
Langston v. Langston
Citations
- 784 A.2d 1086
- 366 Md. 490
- 2001 Md. LEXIS 866
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when the legislative intent is evident from the statutory test, plain meaning governs our interpretation
- interpretation of settlement agreement “begins with the plain meaning of the contractual terms”
- The Court correctly took the position that the plain language of Maryland Rule 2-551(h) authorized an appeal from a court in banc to the Court of Special Appeals; there was, however, no discussion concerning the constitutionality of Rule 2-551(h) and Rule 8-202(d
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Battaglia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.