Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 12/13/1993

Manson v. Stacescu

Citations

  • 11 F.3d 1127
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 32324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendants in Bankers Trust had acted for the “direct purpose” of harming the plaintiffs; however, Bankers Trust involved a direct injury, as discussed above
  • distinguishing between fraudulent activity prior to the purchase of securities and fraudulent activity subsequent to the purchase of securities, and indicating that the special duty exception applies only to plaintiffs alleging the former
  • “The threats . . . were part of a RICO scheme that was directed at the Company, not [him].”
  • injury to creditors from actual diminution in debtor corporation’s assets was indirect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.