· 6/29/2006
Tal v. Hogan
Citations
- 453 F.3d 1244
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16437
- 2006 WL 1775371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the court can take judicial notice of public documents to show their contents but not to prove the truth of matters stated
- holding that a court may take judicial notice of facts which are a matter of public record
- holding that a court may take judicial notice of facts which are a matter of public record when considering a motion to dismiss
- holding that a court may take judicial notice of facts which are a matter of public record when considering a motion to dismiss
- holding that a court may take judicial notice of facts that are a matter of public record
- holding that courts may take judicial notice of court records “to show their contents, not to prove the truth of matters asserted therein” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Murphy, O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.