Skip to main content
· 6/29/2006

Tal v. Hogan

Citations

  • 453 F.3d 1244
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16437
  • 2006 WL 1775371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the court can take judicial notice of public documents to show their contents but not to prove the truth of matters stated
  • holding that a court may take judicial notice of facts which are a matter of public record
  • holding that a court may take judicial notice of facts which are a matter of public record when considering a motion to dismiss
  • holding that a court may take judicial notice of facts which are a matter of public record when considering a motion to dismiss
  • holding that a court may take judicial notice of facts that are a matter of public record
  • holding that courts may take judicial notice of court records “to show their contents, not to prove the truth of matters asserted therein” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Murphy, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.