Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 9/28/1995

Bingham v. Zolt

Citations

  • 66 F.3d 553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the jury was asked to determine “when the estate actually knew of defendants’ alleged wrongful acts”
  • reasoning that “[a]ll of plaintiffs alleged injuries ... are more properly characterized as new predicate acts, rather than new injuries.”
  • noting that the Second Circuit has “consistently held that RICO’s pattern and enterprise requirements are not unconstitutionally vague”
  • finding no standing for the estate of an individual to pursue claims regarding property wholly owned by the individual’s corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Newman, Oakes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.