Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 12/28/1995

Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

Citations

  • 72 F.3d 1085
  • 1995 WL 764336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trustee had no standing to pursue claims of fraud against the debtor's accountant because under Connecticut law those claims belonged to investors
  • holding that the claims “are the property of those investors, and may be asserted only by them and to the exclusion of [the Trustee]”
  • holding that a bankruptcy trustee is barred from pursuing claims for injuries particularized to certain creditors
  • holding that, under Connecticut law, bankruptcy trustee lacks standing to sue accounting firm hired by debtor for malpractice in connection with debtor’s Ponzi-scheme real-estate-investment operation
  • holding that claims of fraud, negligence, professional malpractice, breach of '• contract, breach of fiduciary duties were “traceable to one of two events alleged in the complaint”
  • holding that “claims predicated upon the distribution of misleading [private placement memoran-da]” belong to the investors, “and may be asserted only by them and to the exclusion of [the trustee]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Kearse, Mahoney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

287 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.