S.D. New York· 7/27/2000
Lakonia Management Ltd. v. Meriwether
Citations
- 106 F. Supp. 2d 540
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that shareholder lacked standing to assert derivative RICO claim in individual capacity, even though he could not bring the claim derivatively because he no longer owned shares in the company
- characterizing “direct/derivative dichotomy as an issue of proximate cause” in the civil RICO context
- stating “no unfairness” in dismissing suit for lack of standing when former shareholder had knowledge of allegedly objectionable conduct before sale of shares and had opportunity to bring derivative action but did not
- looking to offering memorandum, subscription agreement, and partnership agreement on motion to dismiss
- “A decrease in value of a holder’s shares which merely reflects the decrease in value of the firm as a result of the alleged illegal conduct is derivation rather than direct in nature and cannot confer individual standing under RICO.”
- finding “unjustified . . . and harmful” conduct not deceptive
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scheindlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2008-06-04· cited 88×
- G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & BuddS.D. New York· 2002-07-17· cited 37×
- Jordan (Bermuda) Investment Co. v. Hunter Green Investments Ltd.S.D. New York· 2001-07-19· cited 26×
- USA CERTIFIED MERCHANTS, LLC v. KoebelS.D. New York· 2003-05-14· cited 21×
- Palatkevich v. ChoupakS.D. New York· 2016-01-21· cited 18×
- Kommer v. Bayer Consumer HealthS.D. New York· 2017-05-18· cited 18×
- Mackin v. AubergerW.D. New York· 2014-11-07· cited 14×
- Jordan (Bermuda) Investment Co. v. Hunter Green Investments Ltd.S.D. New York· 2002-06-19· cited 12×
- Eames v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceD. Delaware· 2006-02-02· cited 10×
- Hall v. TressicN.D. New York· 2005-08-15· cited 2×
- Prichard v. 164 Ludlow Corp.S.D. New York· 2005-10-12· cited 2×
- Craig Outdoor v. Wally KellyEighth Circuit· 2008-06-04
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 1,453×
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,390×
- Kailash C. Pani, M.D., and Kailash C. Pani, M.D., P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue ShieldSecond Circuit· 1998-07-24· cited 568×
- Bankers Trust Company v. Daniel Rhoades, Herman Soifer and Milton BratenSecond Circuit· 1988-10-03· cited 425×
- Cooper v. ParskySecond Circuit· 1998-04-02· cited 340×
- Martinez v. SimonettiSecond Circuit· 2000-02-04· cited 326×
- McLaughlin v. AndersonSecond Circuit· 1992-04-21· cited 223×
- Robert L. Moore and Jeannette S. Parry v. Painewebber, Inc.Second Circuit· 1999-08-20· cited 201×
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company v. Balfour Maclaine International Ltd.First Circuit· 1992-06-24· cited 198×
- Denny v. BarberSecond Circuit· 1978-05-17· cited 167×
- De Jesus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Second Circuit· 1996-06-25· cited 165×
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellSecond Circuit· 1990-12-10· cited 160×
- S.Q.K.F.C., Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Tricon Leasing CorporationSecond Circuit· 1996-05-28· cited 156×
- Harold Warren v. Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit, a National Banking AssociationSixth Circuit· 1985-04-16· cited 139×
- Dangler v. New York City Off Track Betting Corp.Second Circuit· 1999-09-23· cited 110×
- Rent Stabilization Ass'n of City of New York v. DinkinsSecond Circuit· 1993-09-01· cited 92×
- Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.S.D. New York· 2000-02-25· cited 88×
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.S.D. New York· 1996-04-02· cited 72×
- In Re Sumitomo Copper LitigationS.D. New York· 1998-03-11· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.