· 5/24/2010
Tafari v. McCarthy
Citations
- 714 F. Supp. 2d 317
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56572
- 2010 WL 2044705
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that throwing “urine and feces” on plaintiff, “while certainly repulsive, is not sufficiently severe to be considered repugnant to the conscience of mankind” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- concluding that the correctional facility had a “legitimate penological interest in protecting both guards and inmates by keeping the lights constantly illuminated,” as guards conducted rounds every thirty minutes
- concluding that the correctional facility had a “legitimate penological interest in protecting both guards and inmates by keeping the lights constantly illuminated,” as guards conducted rounds every thirty minutes
- dismissing an excessive force claim because “[a]bsent physical injury, verbal threats and abuse are insufficient to support a constitutional violation”
- collecting cases in which claims of mail tampering did not constitute an adverse action, noting in particular that the plaintiff had alleged only a single instance of mail interference
- “Courts in this circuit have held that claims of mail tampering do not constitute adverse action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David N. Hurd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.