Skip to main content
· 5/24/2010

Tafari v. McCarthy

Citations

  • 714 F. Supp. 2d 317
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56572
  • 2010 WL 2044705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that throwing “urine and feces” on plaintiff, “while certainly repulsive, is not sufficiently severe to be considered repugnant to the conscience of mankind” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • concluding that the correctional facility had a “legitimate penological interest in protecting both guards and inmates by keeping the lights constantly illuminated,” as guards conducted rounds every thirty minutes
  • concluding that the correctional facility had a “legitimate penological interest in protecting both guards and inmates by keeping the lights constantly illuminated,” as guards conducted rounds every thirty minutes
  • dismissing an excessive force claim because “[a]bsent physical injury, verbal threats and abuse are insufficient to support a constitutional violation”
  • collecting cases in which claims of mail tampering did not constitute an adverse action, noting in particular that the plaintiff had alleged only a single instance of mail interference
  • “Courts in this circuit have held that claims of mail tampering do not constitute adverse action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David N. Hurd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.