Ninth Circuit· 4/7/1995
Hamid v. Waterhouse
Citations
- 51 F.3d 1411
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2500
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7693
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting claim for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and misappropriation of funds
- “[O]ur precedents require that we treat a motion to vacate an order of 15 dismissal as a Rule 59(e) motion.”
- depositors lacked standing to bring claims against individuals and firms accused of causing banks to fail
- depositors lacked standing to bring claims against individuals and firms accused of causing banks to fail
- \It is to filter 8 out fantastic suggestions like this [as a basis for recusal] that the word 'reasonable' is part of the 9 recusal test\
- dismissing claims based, in part, on bribery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boochever, Browning, Kleinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Borders v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama· 2003-07-25· cited 104×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1995-04-07· cited 35×
- Grow Michigan, LLC v. LT Lender, LLCSixth Circuit· 2022-10-07· cited 21×
- Wight v. Bankamerica CorporationSecond Circuit· 2000-05-25· cited 14×
- Gonzales v. LLOYDS TXB BANK, PLCC.D. California· 2006-06-07· cited 7×
- Abu Nahl v. Abou JaoudeSecond Circuit· 2020-07-30· cited 3×
- Courtney, John W. v. Halleran, Neal T.Seventh Circuit· 2007-05-07
- Courtney v. PritzkerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-02-22
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 1,453×
- Bank of Marin v. EnglandSupreme Court· 1966-12-05· cited 503×
- Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1989-06-19· cited 393×
- Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1984-08-07· cited 390×
- Dolly M. E. Filartiga and Joel Filartiga v. Americo Norberto Pena-IralaSecond Circuit· 1980-06-30· cited 367×
- Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George ProperNinth Circuit· 1992-06-04· cited 344×
- Hanoch Tel-Oren, in His Capacity as Father, on Behalf of the Deceased, Imry Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab Republic Hanoch Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab RepublicD.C. Circuit· 1984-02-03· cited 311×
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1990-04-24· cited 289×
- Javier Sanchez-Espinoza v. Ronald Wilson Reagan, President of the United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1985-08-13· cited 167×
- Sparling v. Hoffman Construction Company, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1988-12-21· cited 164×
- In Re Estate of Ferdinand E. Marcos Human Rights Litigation. Agapita Trajano Archimedes Trajano v. Ferdinand E. Marcos, and Imee Marcos-ManotocNinth Circuit· 1992-10-21· cited 136×
- In Re Allied-Signal Inc.First Circuit· 1989-12-20· cited 112×
- Jehan Zeb Mir v. Richard G. Fosburg, Perry Ah-Tye, and Horrace WardenNinth Circuit· 1980-07-24· cited 105×
- Iit v. Vencap, Ltd.Second Circuit· 1975-04-28· cited 71×
- Elmer H. Thomassen v. United States of AmericaNinth Circuit· 1987-12-30· cited 65×
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.D.C. Circuit· 1995-02-14· cited 64×
- Adato v. KaganSecond Circuit· 1979-01-29· cited 52×
- Manson v. StacescuSecond Circuit· 1993-12-13· cited 37×
- Hayes v. GrossThird Circuit· 1992-12-29· cited 32×
- Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co.Ninth Circuit· 1945-11-24· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.