Skip to main content
· 9/26/1996

Mandy v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing

Citations

  • 940 F. Supp. 1463
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15467
  • 72 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 317, after it was reported, continued harassment of plaintiff was foreseeable, and defendant had duty to protect against it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tunheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.