Mullen v. Topper's Salon and Health Spa, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying employer’s motion to dismiss claim of negligent supervision when plaintiff alleged she was harassed in the workplace; finding that once plaintiff informed her employer of the harassment, “its persistence became reasonably foreseeable.”
• “[D]elay will not negate a finding of irreparable harm where the plaintiff has a good explanation.”
• “[U]nder Pennsylvania law, an employer may be 18 liable for negligent supervision of an employee where the employer fails to exercise ordinary care to prevent an intentional harm to a third-party which 1
• not decided under Florida law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).