Skip to main content
· 6/24/1998

Smith v. DataCard Corp.

Citations

  • 9 F. Supp. 2d 1067
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9352
  • 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,977
  • 1998 WL 336783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the legal insufficiency of “stray remarks, statements by nondecisionmakers, or statements by decisionmakers unrelated to the decisional process”
  • “In essence, the elements of a section 1981 claim in the employment setting are the same as those of disparate-treatment, race-discrimination claims under Title VII and the MHRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magnuson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.